http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ Eye of Harmony » Recent Posts en-US Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:34:59 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/search.php http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/pariet-without-prescription-order-1#post-144 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:11:35 +0000 ralova977 144@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Ordering Pariet online sponsorship straightforward canto upheaval on behalf of Canada citizens <a href="http://acdcvan.ning.com/profiles/blogs/pariet-imedication-buy-pariet">pariet cheap</a> furthermore devotion neighbors throw out bathe another beside cold run alongside USA alas well. You autonomy poverty fax your original direction pharmacy accomplished order. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/pariet-without-prescription-order#post-143 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:11:05 +0000 ralova977 143@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Ordering Pariet online sponsorship straightforward canto upheaval on behalf of Canada citizens <a href="http://acdcvan.ning.com/profiles/blogs/pariet-imedication-buy-pariet">pariet cheap</a> furthermore devotion neighbors throw out bathe another beside cold run alongside USA alas well. You autonomy poverty fax your original direction pharmacy accomplished order. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/community#post-138 Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:45:31 +0000 desubsro545 138@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>No bad community, very no bad </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-137 Sat, 15 May 2010 16:10:44 +0000 Ben Dawson 137@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Basically, registrations were disabled, now they're not. Try again, you'll find a contact form on Danny's website. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-136 Sat, 15 May 2010 05:18:17 +0000 Ben Dawson 136@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>I'll put the point across to the others </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-135 Wed, 12 May 2010 18:27:06 +0000 Beta Link 135@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Seems registration is disabled over there. :/ </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-134 Wed, 12 May 2010 14:46:58 +0000 Ben Dawson 134@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Too late, the move's already happened... here, I'll link you up man...</p> <p><a href="http://forums.dannystewart.com/" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dannystewart.com/</a> </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-133 Tue, 11 May 2010 15:36:44 +0000 Luke Pietnik 133@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Hmm. I honestly think Eye of Harmony works, it's just under-staffed and under-populated. We need to 1. enlist new writers and/or contributors and 2. actually try and publicise the it. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-132 Fri, 07 May 2010 13:30:31 +0000 Danny Stewart 132@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Alright, screw it. Everyone go back to DannyStewart.com and party like it's 2007.</p> <p><a href="http://forums.dannystewart.com" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dannystewart.com</a></p> <p>I'll work on moving crap over later, but I think Eye of Harmony is deadder than a doornail. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-131 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:44:58 +0000 Danny Stewart 131@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Fuck you, sir. :) </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-130 Fri, 07 May 2010 09:57:14 +0000 Recurring Villain 130@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>maybe he couldn't find the feedback topic because the new site is so hard to navigate </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-129 Fri, 07 May 2010 06:59:48 +0000 Danny Stewart 129@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>"Another plus for the DSF was that it looked nicer, plus it was easier to navigate round."</p> <p>Sure would be nice if you had a complaint about the current site that you brought it to my attention when I asked for feedback on the new forums. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-128 Thu, 06 May 2010 12:03:52 +0000 Ben Dawson 128@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Another plus for the DSF was that it looked nicer, plus it was easier to navigate round. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-127 Thu, 06 May 2010 04:45:35 +0000 Recurring Villain 127@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>i read over all the audio play stuff, haha, some cool stuff in there </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-126 Thu, 06 May 2010 02:19:57 +0000 Ben Dawson 126@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>That was a win for nostalgia </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-125 Thu, 06 May 2010 00:30:13 +0000 Danny Stewart 125@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>You want nostalgia?</p> <p><a href="http://www.dannystewart.com/vbulletin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dannystewart.com/vbulletin/</a> </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-124 Wed, 05 May 2010 21:18:44 +0000 Recurring Villain 124@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>man as long as i dont have to create my fucking account for the ninth time then okay </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-123 Wed, 05 May 2010 15:34:53 +0000 Ben Dawson 123@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>I personally wouldn't mind a reincarnation of the DSF. Considering that's how I got involve in the first place nearly five years ago, it seems sorta nostalgic. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-122 Wed, 05 May 2010 10:31:48 +0000 Danny Stewart 122@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>"The EOH is a great place. I've put my heart here, and it seems like it should stay. (Now what would be really cool is if we had to have the DSF back, that DSF would be like the old one.)"</p> <p>How opposed would you be to simply switching the venue? The community would obviously be retained… I'm just finding it difficult (not to mention pointless) to manage two sites where I could very easily just manage one.</p> <p>"I don't think the problem is that we haven't put our hearts into it. I, for example, haven't posted on here any more or less than on other forums, and I'm always checking back here to see if there have been any new posts."</p> <p>Agreed… and I didn't mean to pick on any specific individuals; I was merely making an observation on the condition of the forums in general (which I think you'll agree is difficult to argue with).</p> <p>"The problem, it seems to me, is simply that just about nobody knows about this forum. We haven't done a very good job advertising."</p> <p>Wholeheartedly agreed. This was a concern of mine since I opened the site, and it never got addressed. Without exposure, there doesn't seem to be much of a point. The simple truth is that I'm very busy with a new job right now. If some people were willing to step up, work on some site exposure (especially posting articles to the main page), and see that the forums were used more actively, I'd be willing to pony up the money to keep EoH going.</p> <p>But without that kind of commitment from even a couple of people, I just don't see the point. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-121 Tue, 04 May 2010 21:19:18 +0000 Beta Link 121@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>I don't think the problem is that we haven't put our hearts into it. I, for example, haven't posted on here any more or less than on other forums, and I'm always checking back here to see if there have been any new posts. The problem, it seems to me, is simply that just about nobody knows about this forum. We haven't done a very good job advertising. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-120 Tue, 04 May 2010 17:49:12 +0000 Dr.Videoman 120@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>The EOH is a great place. I've put my heart here, and it seems like it should stay. (Now what would be really cool is if we had to have the DSF back, that DSF would be like the old one.) </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/so%e2%80%a6#post-119 Tue, 04 May 2010 10:19:05 +0000 Danny Stewart 119@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Thinking about closing Eye of Harmony and moving back to DannyStewart.com. The domain name is about to expire and no one ever really put their heart into the site. Thoughts? </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-118 Mon, 03 May 2010 08:14:37 +0000 Ben Dawson 118@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Yeah, but we only really saw them move their heads, just because they can move super fast, doesn't mean they do with every single movement they make. I think the way they moved was very effective and kinda creepy if I'm honest. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-117 Mon, 03 May 2010 05:39:43 +0000 ronn 117@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>And I thought they were meant to be super fast. They were achingly slow when we saw them move. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-116 Sun, 02 May 2010 11:37:40 +0000 Danny Stewart 116@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>"dear murray gold</p> <p>please come up with at least one alternate piece of "action" music so its not the same one every episode</p> <p>thanks<br /> rv"</p> <p>This.</p> <p>"also you'd think if the angels were storming through a forest they would accidentally look at each other from time to time right"</p> <p>Meh, you'd think they'd be pretty good about that by now. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-115 Sun, 02 May 2010 08:02:01 +0000 Recurring Villain 115@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>also you'd think if the angels were storming through a forest they would accidentally look at each other from time to time right </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-114 Sun, 02 May 2010 05:54:20 +0000 Recurring Villain 114@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>dear murray gold</p> <p>please come up with at least one alternate piece of "action" music so its not the same one every episode</p> <p>thanks<br /> rv </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-113 Sun, 02 May 2010 01:16:22 +0000 Sukid 113@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Well I did wonder in the last thread whether seeing the angels actually moving would reduce their scariness or make for another HOLY SHIT moment. It was the latter.</p> <p>Awesome episode. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-31x05-flesh-and-stone#post-112 Sat, 01 May 2010 17:36:05 +0000 Danny Stewart 112@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>No words adequately describe this pile of awesome. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-111 Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:38:03 +0000 Ben Dawson 111@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Needless to say, this means I'm eagerly awaiting tomorrow night now. I honestly can't remember being so excited about Doctor Who since when I first started watching it. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-110 Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:16:11 +0000 Danny Stewart 110@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p><a href="http://denofgeek.com/television/475151/doctor_who_flesh_and_stone_spoilerfree_review.html" rel="nofollow">http://denofgeek.com/television/475151/doctor_who_flesh_and_stone_spoilerfree_review.html</a></p> <p>Sounds like it will be. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-109 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:53:25 +0000 Ben Dawson 109@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>If part two were to end up as good as part one (or better), I would say this is the strongest story of the series so far. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-108 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:27:36 +0000 Danny Stewart 108@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Me too. No complaints. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-107 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:29:44 +0000 Ben Dawson 107@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>Which works for me. </p> http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/topic/doctor-who-2010-1x04-the-time-of-angels#post-106 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:42:27 +0000 Danny Stewart 106@http://forums.eyeofharmony.net/ <p>I thought of that. The flow reminded me of a 4-parter from the old series. </p>